MGMT20132_2201: Assessment 2 – Novel business proposition and self-reflection

MGMT20132_2201: Evaluation 2 – Novel enterprise proposition and self-reflection 9/5/20, 2(25 pm
https://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=1119218 Web page 1 of three
Evaluation 2 – Novel enterprise proposition and self-reflection
Evaluation 2 – Novel enterprise proposition and self-reflection
New due date: Week 12, Friday 5 June 2020 11:45 PM AEST
Weighting: 50%
Size: 2000 phrases
Please notice that educational misconduct and late submission penalties will apply to this evaluation as per the college insurance policies and
procedures.
Evaluation Overview
This evaluation should be accomplished by college students individually. This evaluation builds on the novel worth proposition developed for an
present enterprise or organisation in evaluation 1. Changes to the novel worth proposition could be made primarily based on evaluation 1 reflection
and suggestions. The evaluation is designed for college students to develop innovation perception and practices by creating a novel enterprise
proposition for an present enterprise or organisation and aligned with the strategic trajectory of the enterprise or organisation. The evaluation
can be designed for college students to self-reflect on their very own innovation capabilities and practices. The evaluation entails writing a 2000-word
report for a novel enterprise proposition inside an present enterprise or organisation. Evaluation particulars and steerage will probably be offered on the
unit web site in Moodle and in school.
You’re strongly inspired to debate your evaluation concepts and recommendations in school with fellow college students and your native lecturer earlier than
you full and submit the evaluation.
Evaluation Steerage
Additional evaluation steerage will probably be offered right here. As we progress within the unit, the unit coordinator will add recommendation right here in response to
scholar questions and discussions. You’re inspired to ask questions and contribute to discussions in school and to create posts on the
web site dialogue discussion board. Be happy to debate your evaluation concepts within the unit dialogue discussion board, earlier than you full and submit the
evaluation.
Evaluation 2 – Checklist of instruments and methods (hyperlink)
Evaluation 2 – scholar information (hyperlink).
Evaluation 2 – Report format (hyperlink)
Evaluation Activity
You’re required to jot down a 2000-word report for a novel enterprise proposal you’ve gotten developed. The enterprise proposal should construct upon your
novel worth proposition developed in evaluation 1 for the prevailing enterprise or organisation chosen in evaluation 1. You need to use
applicable headings to construction the physique of the report.
Your report should show:
Ok. Logical and persuasive articulation of: enterprise mannequin description; worth proposition growth; enterprise operations growth;
provide chain growth; aggressive benefit; monetary worth seize and strategic match (this consists of components 5 to 10 within the
disciplined entrepreneurship canvas and components three to 9 within the enterprise mannequin canvas). 40%
S. Logical and persuasive argumentation in regard to how assumptions and uncertainties associated to: buyer desirability; technical
feasibility; and monetary viability have been addressed thus far and the way they are going to be addressed sooner or later as described in a phased
Dashboard / My models / 2020 Time period 1 / MGMT20132_2201 / Evaluation 2 particulars, steerage and submission
/ Evaluation 2 – Novel enterprise proposition and self-reflection
MGMT20132_2201: Evaluation 2 – Novel enterprise proposition and self-reflection 9/5/20, 2(25 pm
https://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=1119218 Web page 2 of three
feasibility; and monetary viability have been addressed thus far and the way they are going to be addressed sooner or later as described in a phased
growth plan. 16%
Z. Logical and persuasive argumentation for the choice of the innovation instruments and methods used to help the report findings and
suggestions. These should be past the instruments and methods utilized in evaluation 1. Minimal 5 (5) further instruments and
methods should be chosen from the offered listing of instruments and methods. 6%
[. Logical and persuasive application of the selected innovation tools and techniques used to support the report findings and
recommendations. These must be different to the tools and techniques used in assessment 1. Minimum five (5) additional tools and
techniques must be applied from the provided list of tools and techniques. 8%
]. Candid and demanding self-reflection about evaluation 2 duties together with: a mirrored image on the event of private innovation
capabilities and practices; identification of personal private strengths and weaknesses; supported with recommendations for self-improvement.
10%
_. Clear circulate of thought all through the report with: a convincing government abstract; clear and succinct function described within the
introduction; related construction and content material inside the physique of the report; and a transparent and succinct conclusion. 6%
`. Crucial evaluation abilities and integration of related educational and professional literature. A minimal of ten (10) educational and professional
references should be used. four%
a. Applicable in-text referencing and reference listing. Adherence to CQUniversity APA reference type. four%
d. Readability of expression, grammar and spelling. Applicable report format with good use of bullet factors, illustrations and figures. Inside
±10% of the phrase restrict for report, excluding references and appendices: 2000 phrases. 6%
Evaluation References
Aulet, B. (2017). Disciplined entrepreneurship workbook. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Enterprise mannequin technology. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Worth proposition design. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Evaluation Standards
Your report will probably be assessed in line with the next standards.
Your report should show:
Ok. Logical and persuasive articulation of: enterprise mannequin description; worth proposition growth; enterprise operations growth;
provide chain growth; aggressive benefit; monetary worth seize and strategic match (this consists of components 5 to 10 within the
disciplined entrepreneurship canvas and components three to 9 within the enterprise mannequin canvas). 40%
S. Logical and persuasive argumentation in regard to how assumptions and uncertainties associated to: buyer desirability; technical
feasibility; and monetary viability have been addressed thus far and the way they are going to be addressed sooner or later as described in a phased
growth plan. 16%
Z. Logical and persuasive argumentation for the choice of the innovation instruments and methods used to help the report findings and
suggestions. These should be past the instruments and methods utilized in evaluation 1. Minimal 5 (5) further instruments and
methods should be chosen from the offered listing of instruments and methods. 6%
[. Logical and persuasive application of the selected innovation tools and techniques used to support the report findings and
recommendations. These must be different to the tools and techniques used in assessment 1. Minimum five (5) additional tools and
techniques must be applied from the provided list of tools and techniques. 8%
]. Candid and demanding self-reflection about evaluation 2 duties together with: a mirrored image on the event of private innovation
capabilities and practices; identification of personal private strengths and weaknesses; supported with recommendations for self-improvement.
10%
_. Clear circulate of thought all through the report with: a convincing government abstract; clear and succinct function described within the
introduction; related construction and content material inside the physique of the report; and a transparent and succinct conclusion. 6%
`. Crucial evaluation abilities and integration of related educational and professional literature. A minimal of ten (10) educational and professional
references should be used. four%
a. Applicable in-text referencing and reference listing. Adherence to CQUniversity APA reference type. four%
d. Readability of expression, grammar and spelling. Applicable report format with good use of bullet factors, illustrations and figures. Inside
±10% of the phrase restrict for report, excluding references and appendices: 2000 phrases. 6%
Evaluation 2 – Marking rubric (PDF hyperlink)
Evaluation Submission
Submit your report with a canopy sheet displaying: unit quantity and title, evaluation quantity, enterprise title, your title and scholar quantity.
The evaluation submission should be a Phrase file (.doc or .docx).
The evaluation submission should be made right here.
MGMT20132_2201: Evaluation 2 – Novel enterprise proposition and self-reflection 9/5/20, 2(25 pm
https://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=1119218 Web page three of three
CQUniversity Australia acknowledges the standard house owners of the land upon which we stand.
Copyright | Disclaimer | Accessibility | Coverage | Privateness | Proper to Data | ASQA VET High quality Framework | CRICOS Supplier Code: 00219c
| ASQA Nationwide Supplier Quantity 40939 |
You’re logged in as Prasannakumar Yendluri (Log off)
MGMT20132_2201
Submission standing
Submission
standing
No try
Grading standing Not marked
Due date Friday, 5 June 2020, 11r45 PM
Time remaining 27 days 9 hours
Final modified –
Submission
feedback ! Feedback (zero)
Add submission
You haven’t made a submission but.
◀ Instructed readings: Innovation,
expertise and science (hyperlinked) Soar to… Evaluation 2 – Marking rubric (PDF) ▶︎