HRMT20024 T3 2018 – Assessment 1 Presentation guidelines

HRMT20024 T3 2018 – Analysis 1 Presentation pointers
Due date All through tutorial class from weeks 4 – 12 inclusive.
Weighting 25%
Measurement Presentation (most of seven minutes) + PowerPoint slides (most of seven slides)
Finding out outcomes 2, 4
Graduate attributes 1 – 7
Aim The primary goal of this analysis is so to develop a important understanding of future tendencies in HRM contained in the context of current instructional literature. The second goal is to develop your oral communication and presentation talents.
Job Select a topic. On-campus faculty college students will nominate for a topic at school in Week 2. Solely Three-4 exhibits could also be held each week, and the Lecturer will re-allocate faculty college students as required for an excellent distribution. Distance faculty college students should advise the course coordinator by e-mail HRM issues are as follows:
Week 4 HR planning
Week 5 Recruitment and selection
Week 6 Employee relations challenges
Week 7 Managing selection and work-life steadiness
Week eight Effectivity administration
Week 9 Finding out, enchancment and career administration
Week 10 Motivation, rewards and compensation
Week 11 Employee turnover and retention
Week 12 Evaluating and enhancing the HRM function
Select one article in your presentation. Start gathering ideas in your topic with a analysis of a associated textbook chapter and the references on the end of the chapter. Set up an excellent prime quality journal article from the CQU library databases and enterprise press publications much like Harvard Enterprise Overview. The article ought to have been printed inside the ultimate 5 years. Analyse the chosen article to find out a key theme for current evaluation and pondering in your topic, comparatively than merely summarizing the article.
Design your presentation. A template has been provided to data your presentation with the aim to engage your class on the most recent pondering evaluation in your HRM topic. Presentation is to be a most of seven (7) minutes with a most of seven (7) PowerPoint slides. You will need to speak : the title, topic, purpose of the evaluation, approach for the evaluation, argument/findings, Conclusion, and the way in which it contributes to the week’s lecture theme. (Distance faculty college students report a voiceover on powerpoint)
Add your slides sooner than the presentation. Your powerpoint slides must be uploaded sooner than your presentation, to assist with fast marking. You additionally must current your lecturer/tutor with a printed copy of the PowerPoint slides.
Referencing APA referencing. For additional data, see : https://www.cqu.edu.au/?a=14033
Plagiarism Copy detection software program program (TurnitIn) is used on this course and work current in contravention of the copying and plagiarism tips will in all probability be investigated. Penalties apply throughout the case of confirmed conditions of copying, plagiarism and academic dishonesty. Please look at the following hyperlinks to know additional about TurnitIn: http://turnitin.com/en_us/teaching/student-training/viewing- originality-reports http://turnitin.com/en_us/teaching/student-training/about-originalitycheck TurnitIn is barely a software program and judgement should be used whilst you view your Originality Report. TurnitIn does not make a judgement as to what’s referenced accurately, it highlights the nonoriginal supplies in a little bit of labor. You have to use the similarity ranking as a data solely and may then look at the originality report to search out out whether or not or not or not changes must be made to the analysis.
Required Faculty college students ought to familiarise themselves with the following insurance coverage insurance policies and procedures at http://protection.cqu.edu.au: Analysis of Coursework Protection; Analysis of Coursework Concepts; Analysis of Coursework Procedures
HRMT20024 Analysis 1 Rubric –Presentation
Discover: That’s an illustration of the marking requirements that can in all probability be used throughout the Turnitin system. To see your marks on the requirements, open your analysis by Turnitin and click on on on the marking requirements button.The markers will current strategies all by way of your analysis throughout the ‘Grademark’ view in Turnitin. You’ll entry this by clicking on the small blue pencil icon subsequent to your analysis submission.
Whereas there is not a set rule for what your similarity index must be, it’s best to objective for a similarity ranking that is decrease than 20%. It is potential that you’d have a greater stage in case you’ve gotten a very prolonged reference itemizing though. The precept issue to look out for is WHERE the similarity is being confirmed. If there is a extreme stage of similarity found throughout the physique of the analysis, you will perhaps lose marks for not presenting your private ideas. A extreme stage of similarity throughout the physique of your analysis may significantly impact your marks for each of the requirements, as marks are given based on genuine textual content material and appropriately referenced textual content material solely. It is suggested that you simply simply cut back utilizing direct quotes from totally different sources wherever potential. Markers will analyse the similarity ranking reported by Turnitin on a case by case basis.
Key Requirements zero (Not Confirmed) 2 (Poor) Three (Unsatisfactory) 4 (Satisfactory) 5 (Good) 6 (Very Good) 7 (Fantastic)
Proper Referencing 5%
Evaluation objective and question
10% Satisfactory understanding Above widespread understanding Strong understanding Full and
insightful presentation
Method 10% No rationalization of approach Very restricted understanding of approach Restricted understanding of approach Satisfactory understanding Above widespread understanding Strong understanding of approach Full understanding and description of approach
Findings 10% No data nor understanding of the HRM topic.
Inaccurate data of the HRM topic. Irrelevant data launched. Poor understanding of knowledge and concepts launched. Insufficient data of the HRM topic. Data appears to be randomly chosen and by no means related to supplies lined throughout the unit. Restricted understanding of knowledge and concepts launched. Demonstrates satisfactory data of the HRM topic. Data from current pondering in HRM launched and outlined. Satisfactory understanding of knowledge and concepts launched. Demonstrates above widespread data of the HRM topic. Associated data launched from
latest pondering evaluation in HRM. Above widespread understanding of knowledge and concepts launched. Demonstrates good data of the HRM topic with notion and depth. Right, fascinating, and associated data launched from latest pondering evaluation in HRM. Correctly-developed understanding of Data and concepts launched. Demonstrates a whole and very insightful data of the HRM topic. Extraordinarily associated and informative supplies and proof launched from
latest pondering evaluation in HRM. Extraordinarily developed understanding of knowledge and concepts launched.
Article Conclusion 10% No conclusions provided. Transient conclusion Transient conclusion with restricted hyperlinks to the presentation Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of article conclusions Demonstrates above widespread understanding and rationalization of article conclusions Clear and concise rationalization of article conclusion Clear and concise rationalization of article conclusions and implications
Contribution to topic 5% No attempt to hyperlink to week’s theme Very restricted understanding Restricted understanding of how the article contributes to the week’s theme Some understanding of how the article pertains to the
week’s theme Good understanding of how the article pertains to the
week’s theme Strong understanding of how
the article pertains to the
week’s theme Refined understanding of how the article pertains to the week’s theme
Prime quality of presentation 30% No functionality to present. Ideas on the HRM topic is disorganized and by no means coherent. Tempo could be very inappropriate. The scholar’s voice is: not clear; not expressive and/or the student pronounces a number of phrases incorrectly. Ideas on the HRM topic is unclear and by no means in a logical technique. Tempo is inappropriate. The scholar’s voice is: not clear at events; not expressive and/or the student pronounces generally some phrases incorrectly. Ideas on the HRM topic are satisfactorily organised with
readability in parts, pacing passable, though is also over-or under measurement. The scholar’s voice is apparent and expressive at events by way of the presentation. Ideas on the HRM topic are launched in an organised technique, though lack readability in parts, adequately paced. The scholar’s voice is apparent and expressive for most of the presentation. Ideas on the HRM topic are launched efficiently and expressed in an organised technique, appropriately paced. The scholar has a clear voice, and expressive by way of the presentation. Ideas on the HRM topic are clearly and professionally articulated, launched efficiently in an organised technique, and are appropriately paced. The scholar has a clear voice, exceptionally expressive all through the whole presentation.
Seen Aids (20%) No seen aids are used. The seen aids are poorly designed or unrelated to the message launched. Restricted seen aids are used and inappropriately designed. The seen aids are satisfactorily designed and at events assist the presentation. The seen aids are properly designed and adequately assist the presentation. The seen aids are properly designed, confidently used and efficiently assist the presentation. The seen aids are properly designed and confidently used, and add have an effect on to the presentation