HC1041 Assessment Report: IT impact on business

HC1041
Unit Title Information Know-how for Enterprise
Analysis Type Explicit particular person analysis
Analysis Title Report: IT have an effect on on enterprise
Goal of the analysis (with ULO
Mapping) Faculty college students are required to evaluation on an precise life enterprise and the have an effect on of IT on the chosen enterprise.
1. Faculty college students can be succesful to contemplate and justify theoretical and smart information of knowledge experience in a enterprise context.
2. Faculty college students can be succesful to analyse information experience factors in a enterprise environment and provide choices to these factors using their information of knowledge experience and smart methods in a enterprise environment.
three. Faculty college students can be succesful to use evaluation talents analysing tutorial literature and integrating ideas from the literature to the information experience factors in enterprise and in preparation for life-long finding out.
4. Faculty college students can be succesful to understand the ICT profession in information experience.
5. Faculty college students can be succesful to speak using environment friendly oral and written communication devices, act in educated methodology.
6. Faculty college students can be succesful to evaluation and describe the important thing privateness, licensed, ethical and societal factors with respect to managing digital information and information applications.
Weight 25% of the complete marks
Full Marks 25
Phrase limit 1500-2000 phrases
Due Date Week 10
Submission Pointers • All work need to be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Mission Cowl Net web page.
• The duty need to be in MS Phrase format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and a few cm margins on all four sides of your net web page with acceptable half headings and net web page numbers.
• Reference sources need to be cited throughout the textual content material of the report, and listed appropriately on the end in a reference document using Harvard referencing mannequin.
Mission 2 Specs
Goal
The intention of this job is to hunt out newest info that features information security breaches, analyse the chosen info and produce a report.
Mission Requirements
You may be to evaluation an precise life enterprise occasion of your various and the have an effect on of IT on that enterprise.
Important elements
1) Does your chosen enterprise need IT?
2) Why IT is important for enterprise survival?
three) What’s required to make use of IT into your chosen enterprise? (I.e. value, planning, designing, gear, arrange, teaching, and so forth…)
4) How does your chosen enterprise use IT? (internally resembling employees, and externally resembling prospects, suppliers)
5) What benefits and advantages does IT ship to your chosen enterprise? (I.e. revenue, flexibility, reduces value, and so forth….) 6) What sort of risks does IT ship to your chosen enterprise? (i.e. security, privateness, confidentiality) 7) How can your chosen enterprise protect and monitor IT?
Your report will seemingly be assessed on the usual of your evaluation and report presentation. Dialogue need to be associated to your chosen enterprise. Your report is to be throughout the mannequin of a enterprise report. There is a limit of ten pages excluding appendices.
You’ll choose a enterprise from any of the following industries:
• Healthcare
• Meals processing
• Banking and finance
• Telecommunications
• Library
• Transport
• Airways
• Printing and publishing
• Media
• Laptop gaming
• tourism
Examples:
Journey Advisor –https://www.tripadvisor.com.au/
Telstra — https://www.telstra.com.au/
Commonwealth Monetary establishment of Australia — https://www.commbank.com.au/ Qantas — https://www.qantas.com/au/en.html
Marking requirements
Marking requirements Weighting
1. Introduction:
Clear assertion of operate, readability of methods and assumptions; systematic methodology to enterprise.
5%
2. Use of sources:
Software program of associated course concepts, devices and frameworks use of evidences, engagement with the literature.
25%
three. Content material materials:
• Balanced safety of each of the small print,
• Richness of examine;
• Motion of ideas;
• Validity of objectives,
• Use of non-public notion and originality;
• Feasibility of options and implementation consideration
60%
4. Group and Presentation:
Readability of development, top quality of presentation, mannequin and readability.
Title net web page, Desk of contents, Document of abbreviations and/or glossary,
Authorities summary/abstract, Introduction, Physique, Conclusion Solutions, Bibliography, Appendices
5%
5. Citation apply:
Relevant citation of sources and evidences used. 5%
TOTAL Weight 100%
Analysis Solutions to the Pupil
Marking Rubric
Requirements NA Not Satisfacto ry P C D HD Outstandin
g
Introducti on Weight
5.00% zero % Not current
d. 25 % Provided nevertheless have not introduce d the topic of the report. 50 % Introduces the topic of the evaluation report, nevertheless omits a standard backgroun
d of the topic and/or the final -plan- of the report. 60 %
Satisfactori ly
introduces the topic of the evaluation report.
Each regular backgroun d or the report development is missing. 70 % Satisfactoril y introduces the topic of the evaluation report.
Offers a standard backgroun.
Signifies the final -plan- of the report. 80 % Introduces the topic of the evaluation report in an attractive methodology which arouses the reader’s curiosity.
Offers some regular background and signifies the final -plan- of the report. 100 % Introduces the topic of the evaluation report in an particularly taking part methodology which arouses the reader’s curiosity.
Offers an in depth regular background and signifies the final -plan-.
Helpful useful resource use Weight
25.00% zero % Not current
d. 25 % Insufficie nt fluctuate
or
amount
of supportiv e proof used. 50 %
Insufficient supportive proof used. Not always appropriat e and/or current. 60 % Supportive proof used. Not always appropriat e and/or current.
Minimal cited. 70 %
Relevant and
current, supportive proof used. 80 % A ample fluctuate of acceptable and current supportive proof. 100 % An distinctive amount and fluctuate of acceptable and current, supportive proof.
Content material materials
Weight
60.00% zero % Not current
d. 25 % Have not addresse
d all
seven elements. 50 % Lots of the seven elements are addressed satisfactori ly.
Minimal
informatio n provided. Dialogue lacks depth. 60 % All seven elements are addressed satisfactori ly.
Dialogue should not be specific on the chosen enterprise. Dialogue is just too generic and lacks depth. 70 % All seven elements are addressed
satisfactoril y.
Demonstrat ed good understandi ng of the chosen enterprise. Dialogue focuses on the chosen enterprise. 80 %
Dialogue of is of extreme
top quality. Indepth analysis provided. Good understandi ng of the chosen enterprise. Good understandi ng of the issues raised throughout the seven elements. 100 % Distinctive understandi ng of the IT factors raised throughout the seven elements. An intensive analysis of the chosen enterprise. Distinctive evaluation effort on every the enterprise and the seven elements.