Glentech Manufacturing is considering the purchases of an automated components handler for theassembly and test area of its Phoenix, Arizona, plant. The handler will costs $250,000 topurchase plus $10,000 for arrange and employee teaching. If the company undertakes theinvestment, it should automate a part of the semiconductor test area and in the reduction of operatingcosts by $70,000 per 12 months for the next 10 years. However, 5 years into the funding’slife, Glentech ought to spend an additional $100,000 to exchange and refurbish the handler.The funding inside the handler shall be depreciated using straight-line depreciation over 10-years, and the refurbishing costs willbe depreciated over the remaining five-year lifetime of thehandler (moreover using straight-line depreciation). In 10 years, the handler is anticipated to beworth $5,000 although its e-book price shall be zero. Glentech’s tax value is 30%, and itsopportunity worth of capital is 12%.a)Is the mission good for Glentech? Why or why not?b)What can we inform regarding the mission from the NPV profile?c)If the mission have been partially financed by borrowing, how would this impact the investmentcash flows? How would borrowing a portion of the funding outlay impact the price of theinvestment to the company?d)The mission calls for two investments: one immediately and one on the end of Yr 5. Howmuch would Glentech earn on its funding, and the best way should we account for the additionalinvestment outlay in our calculations?e)What are the considerations that make this funding significantly harmful, and the best way would you look at the potential risks of this funding?